James Webb Just Detected A Huge Structure Older Than The Universe!

Thank you EYES 200M for the great pre-Christmas video! 😊 There is actually only one logical answer: Our understanding and view of the infant universe must contain one or more errors: Either the age of our universe is not correct, or we already see a different universe, for example the predecessor or simply a different part of a multiverse. In any case, that means it did NOT start with a singularity but rather we live in a practically timeless infinite cyclic self-renewing universe. I don't see any other options at the moment... 👀

Did I miss the part where "a huge structure older than the universe was found" or is this just clickbait like everything else now?

I am 62, had a great science teacher in High School 1976-1979, we were solving quadratic equations with slide rulers to solve outputs based on inputs for Archaeology

So where does this "huge structure older than the universe" come into it? No mention of it in the video whatsoever! Click bait titles. 👎

I am 61 years old. not a scientist a plumber. but as early as I can remember I was told about infinity. It just goes on forever and ever. Well JWST is telling me Infinity it just keeps going. Seems right to me. but I'm just a plumber.

did i miss something. what 'object' did JWST find that's older than the universe (as the title informs us)?

The Universe means everything. Nothing can be older than everything, as that would mean it was older than itself.

I am 62, had a great science teacher in High School 1976-1979, we were solving quadratic equations with slide rulers to solve outputs based on inputs for chemical reactions. I loved Archaeology and Carbon Dating, read books about Howard Cater, memorized the speed of light, distance to the moon, distance to the sun, what an AU was. Having seen so many scientific corrections over the years, I wonder if our assumptions about radioactive decay, distances in space, the speed of light, etc., are actually accurate. Small errors with such large numbers could cause very different outcomes and resutls.

We have one perspective of the vast cosmos, we probably aren't scratching the surface of the mystery...

Who the hell ever decided that 'our' big bang is exclusive in all eternity, that there aren't other big bang's merging with ours etc etc? It's crazy how as beings capable of incredible thought, we continue to limit ourselves to such linear thinking.

Enough is enough. Stop advertising the greatness of the JWST. You have done that now since the beginning of its launch. We get it and do not disagree. But now we want the data. Lets hear about the things it sees and stop just glorifying the JWSTY..

The AI narrating this video has some strange pronunciation quirks.

It cannot be older than the universe, but it can be older than the 13.7 billion years we have arrived at is the age of the universe, understood

Apparently, there may be a bias against a possibility of a supernatural power, (even WITHOUT any evidence proving there can’t be a transcendent supernatural power). That bias is similar to presupposing the universe gradually evolved WITHOUT observing a single evolving galaxy or star anywhere in the universe, throughout its time of existence.

One logical explanation of Webb's observations is that the universe was instantly fully formed at its very beginning , complete with all of its galaxies already mature. Why can't that possibility be considered? Is there a bias against that possibility?

Something as huge as the Universe cannot be described in 2 words. The idea that we thought we would get it right first time is a very childlike assumption. I think it will be a long time before we grasp such understanding. In my opinion this is a good thing because we humans need something to think about if we didn't have that what good would life be. My favorite thing to do is learn new things. It's like nothing can be more exciting than learning. I am 56 years old and I still love to learn new things.

James Webb just shows we are only scratching the surface, it's dimensional, as we call it fabric of time

That's a bold statement, because of new discoveries we don't know how old the universe is.

Maybe I'm thick but surely if you go back to the big bang,you will eventually go past and out the other side so the further you look back the more you come back to the present time, even though you will be further away by time. If the universe is 13 billion years old, my logic would be that you should be able to see 26 billion light years to the other side. Also on the basis the further you look back, you will be looking across time and will therefore see brighter bigger universes

Logic would state that our universe is recyclable and time is unimaginable🌠