AMD 7000 Series Details! - If you aren't excited, you should be!

820,562
0
Published 2022-08-30
Here are all the juicy details on AMDs new 7000 series Processors!

New Customer Exclusive, Receive a FREE 256GB SSD in Store: micro.center/a6e0ac
Check out Micro Center’s PC Builder: micro.center/4388bb
Submit your Build to Micro Center’s Build Showcase: micro.center/06ac89

Get your JayzTwoCents Merch Here! - www.jayztwocents.com

○○○○○○ Items featured in this video available at Amazon ○○○○○○

► Amazon US - bit.ly/1meybOF
► Amazon UK - amzn.to/Zx813L
► Amazon Canada - amzn.to/1tl6vc6

••• Follow me on your favorite Social Media! •••
Facebook: www.facebook.com/jayztwocents
Twitter: www.twitter.com/jayztwocents
Instagram: instagram.com/jayztwocents
SUBSCRIBE! bit.ly/sub2JayzTwoCents

All Comments (21)
  • @Rexars
    Man when I built my first rig 10 years ago, you couldn't pay me to use AMD. Now it's a no brainer... Amazing to see such a turn around
  • @brianm.595
    I found the boost cores exceeding 5ghz at such low wattage to be the most interesting thing. Glad AMD was able to maintain efficiency and not go back toward the bulldozer, space heater days.
  • @PulsarTECH
    That's great that AMD has once again confirmed their intention of keeping a new AM5 Socket across different CPU generations and architectures! Bravo!
  • @krashd
    3:50 The jump from 105W to 170W is not because of the 5.7 boost, it is because the 7900 and 7950 have two CCDs (Core Complex Die). The 7900 and the 7950 are pairings of the 7600 and 7700 respectively. The 7600 has 1x6 core die and the 7700 has 1x8 core die, the 7900 has 2x6 core dies and the 7950 has 2x8 core dies.
  • @madnessbrah
    The thing I've liked about AMD the past few years is that while they're improving performance, in comparison to NVIDIA and Intel they're seeming to be putting more focus on still being more efficient. Seems like the other two are now just throwing efficiency out the window and going for raw power
  • @HonuManHi
    Let me begin by saying that I am a long time AMD fan. I hope Intel comes back with a counter punch soon, because a heated race benefits the entire community. That being said, it is nice to see what AMD has become under Dr. Su.
  • I've been building PC's for the better part of my life. Die hard Intel. Until this last build, I went AMD I got a 5950X. I've never lost and Intel, I cannot complain about Intel. But I am excited to support growth no matter where it comes from, and I agree NVIDIA needs the competition Intel got.
  • @MarkGrayJr
    As an Intel fan, I love this. Intel has been sitting stagnant for far too long, and hopefully this thrashing will be what it takes to get them working again. THE EFFICIENCY ALONE is breathtakingly good! And that's BEFORE looking at the clock speeds. 👏🏻 GG AMD. That's all I have to say. Well done! 👏🏻
  • @scyphe
    The Ryzen 7950X is showing just how fast AMD caught up to Intel with a very well designed and thought out solution. A 16c/32t CPU that boosts up to 5.7 GHz with the very optimized power usage is amazing. The 7950X is obviously a flagship workstation CPU that doesn't make sense for gaming purposes(the 7700X seems to be the sweet spot to me) but the same technology is used in the other 7-series Ryzens. Amazing feat by AMD.
  • @Tiki832
    The thing AMD have been doing right since Zen 1 is to focus on efficiency first, then scale it up later as the underlining technology matures. It's a lesson both Intel and Nvidia thought they had much longer to wait until they needed to start to learn it. Already we're seeing Nvidia GPUs in the same position Intel CPUs were a few years back.... they have the raw horsepower but they didn't really have the scalability behind it to take it much further without sweeping architectural changes, and so in order to keep appearances of staying ahead of AMDs offerings each generation they have to push their focus on raw horsepower harder and harder showing the cracks in terms of power consumption and iterative gains. And lets be honest here, DLSS has saved Nvidia for a while now. What was meant to be a alternative Anti-Aliasing technology that was pretty flaky in results was quickly re-directed and re-marketed by Nvidia as a resolution scaling technology to obscure just how tight the performance gap between AMD and Nvidia now is, even in Real Time Ray Tracing usage. Someone at Nvidia was clearly aware of what was happening and the position they would find themselves in across the next few generations due to the sheer time it would take to address the core architecture approach to their GPUs that they currently have adopted, and the decision to lean on software solutions as a crutch to try soften the blow was pretty smart. But without a radical change in approach, it is only slowing the pace. Not changing the outcome
  • @deenyc1049
    The race is back on, I should be good for a few years on my 5900X so I'm excited to see the back and forth between AMD and Intel.
  • @DanielA23
    I remember in electronics class I had a guy talking about how 1Ghz CPUs were going to be a stretch for the silicone. Obviously a long time ago but fun to see how things just keep advancing,
  • @Tornado1487p1
    I decided to give AMD a second chance after my FX-8350 and went with them again, upgrading to a ryzen 5 3600. Glad I did, AMD customer for the foreseeable future! Excited for AM5!
  • @smokingone
    I'm excited to see the overclock potential of these new chips considering they are boosting at such low wattages.
  • It's great seeing AMD go from an overheating joke to an efficiency king. I was super surprised at the 5.7ghz clocks, but so glad to see them finally show up on cpus. I felt like 3/4ghz was never going to improve after 12 years between them. I'm really stoked at how well these cpus are looking compared to last gen ...and I really want to get my hands on the proper 3D chip that'll come out, since the last one was just a prototype.
  • So, I've been back on a PC building kick since about Zen 2 launch and every time AMD knocks it out of the park, I'm kicking myself for not waiting. The constant progress and push they've been laying down since Zen 1 has been staggering. Full disclosure; my first PC build was a AMD Athlon (Clawhammer, I think?) and it went for nearly 10 years of overclocking and bad case design before it croaked. I stayed with AMD as I couldn't afford Intel in the early 2010s. I'm not a AMD fan boy, as I have used and owed multiple Intel systems - But it seems like every time I come back to the PC building fold - AMD is there with exactly what I need at the exact right time. RDNA1 was pretty rough though.
  • Not since I was younger pulling apart 386s and learning what it was to be a PC enthusiasts have I been sooooooo excited about the healthy state of the industry and level of engineering and leaps of performance each generation and the competition that's now driving it. And as always Jay you are apart of all of that. Keep that spark alive in others and look forward to the next video 🤓
  • @ast_rsk
    This is all very exciting, but I really really want to see whats on the road map for the technology behind 3D Cache, because I have this sneaking feeling that it could be used for so much more than just extra cache. More specifically, to "fold" the current chip in a way that lets them double everything without compromising on trace distance.
  • I was on the Intel train for about 15 years now and I was always happy with it. What AMD now pulls out of the hat is amazing and I am considering to by an AMD setup next time. But with the graphics card I still would go for Nvidia