Why Space Itself May Be Quantum in Nature - with Jim Baggott

1,280,909
0
Published 2019-05-15
Loop quantum gravity aims to unify the theories of general relativity and quantum mechanics, as explained by Jim Baggott.
Subscribe for regular science videos: bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
Buy Jim's book "Quantum Space": geni.us/7cLy

Quantum gravity is the holy grail for modern theoretical physicists – a single structure that brings together the two great theories of the 20th century: quantum mechanics and general relativity. One widely-known solution is string theory, which emerged from particle physics. In this talk, Jim Baggott will describe the other approach known as Loop Quantum Gravity. This theory starts from general relativity, borrows many ideas and techniques from quantum mechanics, and predicts that space itself is quantum in nature.

Watch the Q&A:    • Q&A: Why Space Itself May Be Quantum ...  

Jim Baggott is an award-winning science writer. He trained as a scientist, completing a doctorate in chemical physics at the University of Oxford in the early 80s, before embarking on post-doctoral research studies at Oxford and at Stanford University in California.

This talk was filmed at the Ri on 12 February 2019.

---
A very special thank you to our Patreon supporters who help make these videos happen, especially:
Darren Jones, Dave Ostler, David Lindo, Elizabeth Greasley, Greg Nagel, Ivan Korolev, Joe Godenzi, Lester Su, Osian Gwyn Williams, Radu Tizu, Rebecca Pan, Robert Hillier, Roger Baker, Sergei Solovev and Will Knott.
---

The Ri is on Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheRoyalInstitution
and Twitter: twitter.com/ri_science
and Facebook: www.facebook.com/royalinstitution
and Tumblr: ri-science.tumblr.com/
Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/home/editorial-policy
Subscribe for the latest science videos: bit.ly/RiNewsletter

All Comments (21)
  • @doronron7323
    I've watched RI lectures since I can't remember (I'm 64). Jim carefully talked his presentation through in such a way that I heard and could digest every word. Perhaps the sound effects weren't necessary, but otherwise he managed to avoid any other dramatic concessions. For an interested layman, I've never seen a better lecture on this or any other subject. Thank you.
  • @allurbase
    If you already listened countless talks about general relativity you can skip to 38:00
  • He has a wonderful talent for making these extremely difficult concepts (somewhat) understandable while putting the listener at ease about not totally understanding it.😊
  • @AndyinMokum
    As a layman, I found your lecture fascinating. The sound effects were quite alarming; especially for someone who's profoundly deaf in one ear. What sounds I can hear, are extremely distorted and Dalek like. Needless to say, I jumped quiet a few times 🤣. I'll have to watch the video a few more times. Some of the concepts you introduce, are really hard to get one's head around. They simply don't comport to our everyday perception of space and time. As I said, the lecture was fascinating, thank you for sparking my curiosity 😀.
  • @garyrafiq9561
    The closed captions (subtitles to you Brits) are great and error-free! Thank you, Royal Institution, for the captions, and the caption representation of the sound effects is helpful. Nothing wrong with those sound effects if they make the lecture interesting.
  • @steveray65
    "To see a World in a Grain of Sand And a Heaven in a Wild Flower, Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand And Eternity in an hour." William Blake
  • @MrTommy4000
    I guess the first half rehash is unavoidable, but the second half was highly effective in guiding me towards a better understanding of the big picture. Cheers to all involved in producing this little gem !
  • Someone somewhere is working hard to truly push this information into a new era of experience and conductivity! We can help by learning and pushing toward our own goals, no matter how small or large they may be! Cheers to the Roaring 20’s as they happen! So excited to see where all of this information heads 🧘🏽‍♂️🕰❤️
  • @Li.Siyuan
    Thank you for this; I've been looking for years for a clear explanation of LQG and now I've found it!
  • @JFJ12
    The first time I could follow a scientific explanation from start to finish and able to understand it all the time.
  • @SirRelith
    This was such a fantastic explanation. I've watched several videos on loop quantum gravity and I believe this one to be the best so far.
  • @nickb9237
    Loved this presentation, I put it at 1.25x speed like the other comments suggested, not sure why everyone is griping about the SFx, I can’t watch regular science shows anymore, I only digest lectures from theoretical physicists. Loop quantum gravity is an alternative to string theory , I recommend Brian Greene’s “the elegant universe” for more on gravity and quantum mechanics. Thanks for posting this RI.
  • @davidwright8432
    If there's one thing that gets me mad, Jim, it's 'Don't worry about ...', since usually, that's exactly where I do want to go. Not understanding it, means it's what I need to find out about. That aside, an interesting and well-presented talk; thanks. And yes, Jim, I've bought several of your books, the latest included. Be bold, bloody and brave with the next one - and put the damn math in!! I'm sure I'm not the only one with that feeling. Hawking's editor who said every equation halves the sales, was an - ok, let's just say, was misguided.
  • A sidenote. It seems to me that particle physics is the real interpretation of the universe, while relativity is an approximation on the macro scale. Just like Newton's theory of gravity was a more imprecise approximation before that. I think we need to abandon relativity and try to extrapolate new macro theories from quantum mechanics.
  • @eggsandwine
    "...have you heard the new album of Cosmic Metronome, Jim..." Brilliant! Thank you mr Baggott and RI for another excellent talk.
  • @danievdw
    Really enjoyed the way Dr Baggot covered all this. Very interesting.
  • @macbuff81
    RI is a great institution! Humanity at its finest :) I was never really good at physics in high school, but I feel I have gained great insight and understanding by watching these really intuitive lectures. Brian Cox had similar great lectures and TV series. SciShow and similar YouTube shows are similar great resources. I wish I had them when I was in high school in the 90s. Then again it's never too late to learn. I'm currently pursuing a master's in public health and I love it though it would be even better if I had scholarship :) It is nice to see how biology, physics, chemistry and psychology intersect. To understand the universe and use that understanding to make a difference. I would love to see a lecture live in person someday.
  • @Robyzed57
    WOW Dr. Baggott, thank you so much for the crystal clear explanation. I see Smolin changed his mind about Time, much to Professor Rovelli's annoyance, I suppose. Furthermore, as a layperson, I just hope one day to see string theorists and LQG supporters publicly confront each other, comparing ideas instead of filling square meters of blackboard with math....as I must confess I'm still unable to understand the substantial differences between the two approaches to the problem.