'Off the back burner': Democrats get serious about reforming corrupt Supreme Court

2,759
0
Published 2024-07-30
Melissa Murray, co-host of the "Strict Scrutiny" podcast, talks with Alicia Menendez about reforms to rules about Supreme Court conduct proposed by President Joe Biden, and the focus by Democrats to do more than criticize the Supreme Court as its conservative majority has turned it into a political vehicle.  

» Subscribe to MSNBC: youtube.com/msnbc

Download our new MSNBC app for the latest breaking news and daily headlines at a glance: www.msnbc.com/information/download-msnbc-app-n1241…

Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: www.msnbc.com/
Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: link.msnbc.com/join/5ck/msnbc-daily-signup
Find MSNBC on Facebook: www.facebook.com/msnbc/
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: twitter.com/MSNBC
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: www.instagram.com/msnbc

#SupremeCourt #Biden #Democrats

All Comments (21)
  • It’s about time! They shouldn’t be able to get away with being corrupt without consequences
  • @cyndlehick9777
    Don’t they have lifetime appointments? That should change. Nobody should be in office for life.
  • Democrat establishment has no idea the real issues the majority of voters care about
  • This all reminds me of the democrat media machine in 2016. Everything is amazing. Total momentum. Bright future ahead. Its like a sales ad.
  • That would be beautiful! They're actually making rulings that uphold the constitution. That's no good. How would we be able to force our will on the populace with that stupid thing in the way? 😂😂😂😂😂
  • @htvlogs80
    If Congress wants to put term limits on the Supreme court, then they need to put term limits on themselves. Whatever the number is for SCOTUS, should be the same for both house and senate. Put your money where your mouth is.
  • @alaska1098
    🎄"Merry...UH...Uh...Happy...UH...you know the thing." 🎄- Joe Biden
  • What's even with this 18 year thing? Their term should be limited to the term of the President that appoints them, which is to say 8 years max with the option of the next Presidency reappointing them.
  • @henrywright6565
    The worst part of the immunity ruling is that, imho, Barrett gave a really good way to meet in the middle.
  • @doscinco25mp
    Remember when the Democrats & Secret Service allowed an assasaination attempt on Republican Nominee 45th President of the USA Donald J. Trump
  • @SwarmerBees
    Can we talk about things that Congress can practically achieve with simple majorities? Justice term limit constitutional ammendment is fantasy land. How is this "Getting serious"?!? You might was well propose a constitutional ammendment for the ERA or to constrain gun ownership. Congress can expand and has expanded the size of the court, and can do that with a simple majority. Why isn't anyone talking about this simple practical measure?
  • @Why815
    Pathetic group picture! Too bad the three good judges ( and we all know who they are) have to stand in for this photo! In other words… “what’s wrong with this picture?” besides the obvious.