The Sci-Fi Movie That Ended Two Hollywood Legends: BRAINSTORM (1983)

As far as finishing a movie after a star dies during production, I think we can all agree that Ed Wood nailed it on the first try.

I don't care if it was considered a flop. I liked it.

I adore this movie! No one talks about it but it’s fucking amazing. This among movies like Dreamscape, Altered States, and Buckaroo Banzai warped my young brain into the totally stable adult I am now.

I agree with your assessment that this movie has been unfairly panned. It's a great story with 10 tons of "heart fuzzies". I think Natalie was at her most expressive level of acting and looked more beautiful than ever. Christopher Walken is... well, he's Cristopher Walken, enough said. The supporting cast is brilliant, from Louise Fletcher to Cliff Robertson. Obscenely underrated.

Got to see this movie as a kid the night broadcast tv was showing The Day After. My parents had been invited to a coworkers house for a TDA watch party like it was GoT. They hired a babysitter with strict instructions not to watch TDA. So our baby sitter let us watch the illegally descrambled UHF HBO channel and Brainstorm was what was on.

For those lucky enough to see this movie in a theater that could maximize the 35/70mm viewing on a very large screen, this movie was a sight to behold. The opening sequence gave everyone a real sense of vertigo.

Interesting how the same technology in the hands of James Cameron gave us Strange Days, a crime drama where memory recordings were hustled like illegal drugs.

A favorite movie. The subject matter was fascinating and Trumbull made you believe the hardware was real, but you had to give the butchered script some extra thought as they directly addressed the type of things the "array system" would be used for - everything from travelogs to porn. "I'm more than I was..." is something I'm still trying to figure out.

Saw it in the cinema when it came out. Much like when I saw Blade Runner in the cinema when it came out, I watched it in an almost empty theatre. Both were panned when they came out and I absolutely loved both of them.

REALLY loved the Elion-Hitchings Building & it's architecture, both inside & out. Feels like a building from an alternate future that never was, like something out of Blade Runner or Tron. Wish we had more architecture like that today.

This movie doesn't get enough attention. I'm glad you did something about that.

As a young boy, I watched Brainstorm several times on HBO back in the summer of '84. I liked it. Especially the scene when Walken's character first tries to hack into the system to access the "death tape." Btw, great score by the late James Horner.

Despite its flaws, it remains my all-time favorite SF movie. Trumble was clearly a genius.

Honestly one of my favorite movies that Walkin was in. Great actors, and really intriguing ideas. I have to agree with you, Geek, about Louise Fletcher being the strongest performance. I was young when I saw this, and I wasn't sure she had only been acting, she was so convincing. I did also enjoy her in DS9, because good stories need good antagonists. Now... to go listen to Weapon of Choice to decompress after remembering that scene...

I loved that movie... 25 years later I worked for a company that had labs like the movie and they looked the same. ...

I remember when this film came out. It had been in production hell for 2 years, It wasn’t well advertised, the movie trailers as I recall were not very good, it was getting bad to lukewarm reviews from critics, and there was a dark cloud over it because of Wood’s highly publicized mysterious death. It just plain never had a chance.

Definitely one of my favourite hard SF films, despite its drawbacks. It is one of a kind, and I have eagerly awaited a review from you. Well done, TUG (though I’m disappointed you did not mention the music by the late James Horner, one of my three favourite film composers). I found my first viewing of this absorbing, despite great drawbacks. It was in a flea pit cinema, so lacked the full 70 mm format, and a few rows ahead of me was the distraction of the only other occupants in the cinema pulling their feet up off the ground because of rats scuttling past! The film deserved better. 🙂 I agree that the best performance was from Louise Fletcher, while Christopher Walken and Natalie Wood were both more than adequate in their roles. The special effects were innovative for their time, particularly the “memory bubble” effect, and the subject matter at the time was groundbreaking and interesting. Having focused largely on the production hassles, you perhaps ran out of time for other interesting matters such as the question of life after death. On that point, the plot’s visual hints were more ambiguous than they might have seemed – appearing to support the religious view, though leaving the opportunity for atheists to interpret the visuals as simply in the mind of Fletcher’s character. This film was in the best tradition of hard science fiction, leaving food for thought long after viewing. I agree, it is a science fiction classic, that initially struggled to find the right audience. Since then it has undergone a renaissance, though, with BluRay copies now prohibitively expensive online.

Nice review, Eric. Per that last question, it's my understanding that the insurance riders on the bigger budget films includes stipulations for additional funding for reshoots if an actor, at least the "above the line" ones, dies during principal photography and probably breaks down in a number of ways ( we all no those pesky clauses insurance providers like to slip in) such as if the actor dies after principal photography but before additional photography or various post production stages. At the time, from my outsider perspective, Natalie Woods' death seemed to be so twisted and exploited by different parties. The story about what happened that night always sounded like BS and I think Walken's career suffered (seemingly unjustly) and Robert Wagner's (came off as a suspect and stayed out of sight until maybe Wayne's World?). The end product was muddied in a number of ways. IMO, I call that "death by committee." I did like the film, comparing it somewhat to Dreamscape that seemed to edge it out. I'm not sure when MGM got into so much financial trouble but the late 70's and 80's were not good. They started selling off big chunks of their film rights to all of their big musical films. I worked there briefly in the early 90's, temping in between jobs in their payroll and residuals department. I knew exactly what kind of paychecks were being cut for their top executives. The most memorable residual check was to Marlon Brando for about $40,000 for a movie he did called Missouri Breaks. I couldn't tell you how often those were paid out, but I thought it was good money for a film I'd never seen from about 10 years(?) before, even if it were only annually. I looked it up once but still haven't ever watched it. This also occurred at their old location, and they were preparing to move the studio to somewhere over in Santa Monica due to all their financial restructuring.

This film made a big impression on me when I watched it on TV in 1988 when I was a kid. That death sequence frightened me so much, memorable visuals

For me, this film is one of my favourites, and that is due to the cast, premise, and effects. I did see this at the cinema, and I have a copy in my library. It is tragic that the film could not have been completed due to the greater tragedy of Natalie's demise. As far as the in-film technology goes, it all seemed okay to me. I see the tapes as a multi-track recording, or which some data is physiological, which is why the key recording in the story way kill as it feeds cardio shutdown instructions into the brain. I also figured that emotional responses could be triggered from physiological control. But that is just my conjecture. It was a great film, and as stated, a forgotten classic. And unfortunately, a footnote in certain careers.