Why & When You Should be Using Claude over ChatGPT

2024-07-11に共有
Anthropic introduced a new feature that is surprisingly useful and today we look at when you should be using it over GPTs by OpenAI.

Links:
claude.ai/projects
chatgpt.com/gpts
chatgpt.com/g/g-jn619yw8Y-custom-gpt-builder

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0:00 ChatGPT vs Claude
1:05 GPTs Advantages
3:08 GPTs Disadvantages
5:03 Claude Projects Advantages
6:18 Claude Projects Disadvantages
6:33 Important Notes
8:25 Writing
9:36 Coding
11:03 Sharing
12:00 Custom Tutors
12:51 Repetitive Tasks

#claudeprojects #claude #gpts


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🔑 Get My Free ChatGPT Templates: myaiadvantage.com/newsletter
🎓 Join the AI Advantage Course + Community: myaiadvantage.com/community
🤯 Unlock ChatGPT's true potential: shop.myaiadvantage.com/produc...
🐦 Twitter: twitter.com/TheAIAdvantage
📸 Instagram: www.instagram.com/ai.advantage/
🛒 AI Advantage Shop: shop.myaiadvantage.com/

コメント (21)
  • I signed up to Claude pro version yesterday never thought I would cheat on chat GPT but I did
  • 2 updates since the recording: - Claude added a limited data analysis tool - You can now share artifacts (not projects (except with team on teams plan)
  • to save you up some time: Based on the transcript, here are some key reasons to use Claude over ChatGPT: 1. Better tone and style: Claude's responses are generally considered more human-like and fluid in writing style. 2. Superior coding abilities: Claude (especially the Claude 3.5 Sonnet model) is widely regarded as better at coding tasks compared to ChatGPT. 3. Longer context window: Claude projects can handle more context in the knowledge base, allowing for more comprehensive understanding of larger documents or multiple files. 4. Multiple chats in one interface: Claude projects allow you to have multiple related conversations within a single project, which is useful for complex or multi-faceted tasks. 5. Better for project-based work: Claude projects are well-suited for tasks that involve multiple steps or evolving requirements, especially writing and coding projects. 6. More exploratory: Claude projects are better for open-ended tasks where you're not sure exactly what direction the work will take. 7. No need for prompt presets: Claude doesn't rely on conversation starters, making it more flexible for various types of interactions. 8. Better for one-off projects: Claude projects are ideal for tasks that you'll complete and then archive, rather than recurring use cases. While ChatGPT has some advantages in terms of additional tools (like image generation and web browsing) and shareability, Claude is often preferred for its core language and coding capabilities, especially in project-based scenarios.
  • I agree. I think the features of claude are a bit better. However, Claude's limits are just ridiculous. If you use a lot of tokens, you get only 10 or 15 chats before you have to wait for the 5-hour cooldown. Also, when programming, there is no way to continue the response after the message limits triggers. I code stuff and this isn't very pleasant when working with substantial code snippets.
  • @Ben_D.
    'GPT-4o works for you and Claude Sonnet works with you' So well spoken and really helps people pick. Like a Sorting Hat at Hogwarts, you know where your affiliation lies.
  • @abbdiego
    GREAT VIDEO , i watched it and didnt realize how fast time went
  • Great video and sums up the differences very well. I find Claude Projects on a Pro plan are great for exploring and brainstorming, but limits get in the way most days if the project is complex or has a lot of context. I found GPTs more accurate with large context (40,000 words) than Claude, IF the document is well structured and the prompt well formulated, and more importantly had zero issues with limits (I'm on a GPT Teams account)
  • I write GPTs that use my custom APIs. I can only do that with ChatGPT. I do agree Claude's code generation is better and Artifacts is a great UI tool, so I tend to use Claude for some basic function coding, until I run out of chats.
  • @akust
    0:46 the fingers show that you are artificial 😄
  • Nice comparison but doesn’t Claude now do data analysis and allow sharing of projects and artifacts? If I load csv files and PDFs etc it does create charts and graphs and do analysis. And I can see an option to ‘Publish’ artifacts from Claude as well, which allows other users to see them and ‘remix’ them.
  • The adaptability of Vematum to market changes is a key strength.
  • You can add the ChatGPT ability to understand and speak different languages as well the multimodal capabilities where you can just talk to the model and it can respond directly with voice
  • @cait7822
    Thank you! Can we have a video on custom instructions in projects? Like a use case deep dive for making something come to life in a claude project using the key features.
  • I have used both GPT4, 4o and Claude Sonnet for months. Most of my work requires solid writing with a human tone and style. Claude crushes chatGPT on this front. I ended my sub with chatGPT.
  • Cant share GPT convos if there are any images in thread 🧐