China Blames NATO For Wars In Afghanistan & Iraq, Says Washington Summit Declaration “Full Of Lies”
8,999
2024-07-26に共有
Spokesperson Zhang Xiaogang slammed the alliance when asked to comment on the declaration adopted earlier this month at a NATO summit in Washington, DC.
In recent years, NATO has continued to "spread its evil hooks" into the Asia-Pacific region, said Zhang. The spokesperson in Beijing went on to accuse the Western alliance of instigating conflicts around the world. The Alliance is attacking China and encouraging certain countries in the region to follow suit, Zhang added.
#china #nato #russia #xijinping #putin #joebiden #worldnews
n18oc_world n18oc_crux
0:00 INTRODUCTION
2:05 NATO DECLARATION SLAMS CHINA’S MILITARY SUPPORT FOR RUSSIA
3:25 “DISSATISFIED” CHINA “PROTESTS” NATO COMMUNIQUE
CRUX is your daily video news guide to the big events that are shaping our world. We track news, geopolitics, diplomacy and defence strategies and explain how they shape national policies. Crux makes sense of global developments, and analyses their impact on daily lives.
Follow CRUX on Telegram: bit.ly/3fnlLua
Follow CRUX on Instagram (@crux.india): bit.ly/3qSFx1K
Follow CRUX on Facebook: bit.ly/2Lte7iF
#GetCloserToTheNews with latest headlines on politics, sports and entertainment on news18.com bit.ly/2Y4QccL
Also watch:
Crux Decode: bit.ly/3MjzIoG
Crux+ : bit.ly/35mm97B
Crux Most Watched: bit.ly/3KhJ8iX
コメント (21)
-
When Tony Blair invaded Iraq for the non existent weapons of mass destruction. The invasion of Iraq was neither in self-defense against armed attack nor sanctioned by UN Security Council resolution authorizing the use of force by member states and thus constituted the crime of war of aggression, according to the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) in Geneva.
-
natos upset because china is not bending the knees
-
China's comments are very right.
-
NATO intervention in Libya was extremely controversial due to its failure in outlining what the true objectives were. Although the intervention was framed under Responsibility to Protect, it is clear that regime change was the priority for NATO—though it does not follow from this that NATO failed to protect the Libyan population in its entirety. As discussed, it is unquestionable that NATO’s short-term priority was regime change (excluding the initial justification under Responsibility to Protect), and this was achieved. However, this alteration of mission objectives questions the legitimacy of the intervention, and of NATO itself.
-
finally! the gloves are off❣❣❣❣❣:washhands:NATO is bull shit
-
Most weapons made by Nato use parts and tools from China as well.
-
Well China speaks the truth.
-
China is very much correct!
-
L'union européenne a perdu la guerre contre la Russies.
-
NATO bullies have got a blood lust 😂😂😂
-
The moment when you realise you weren't born of the good guys
-
Those leaders of the western world must have special school to learn to lie without shame it's surreal but true
-
Y they just don’t cut ties with them
-
China is 100% right!
-
China has now taken the gloves off so now what? 😂😂😂😂
-
They know all of history just when it.helps them. These guys need reality.
-
Too true
-
So sad if China 🇨🇳 sending materials to Russia 🇷🇺 to make missile what would you say about America who is sending direct missile weight 2000kg to Israel
-
"Order out of Chaos" is their motto
-
We Afghans love China
