London’s Ulez battle: blade runners, dinosaurs and conspiracy theories

177,889
0
Published 2024-01-11
The UK capital's ultra-low emission zone charges the drivers of more polluting road vehicles every time they enter the city. But since the Ulez was extended to the whole of London by the city's mayor, Sadiq Khan, the backlash has become increasingly ferocious.

Self-styled ‘blade runners’ are waging a campaign to cut down Ulez cameras, activists wearing inflatable dinosaur outfits track and block mobile vans and protesters regularly turn out to drive anger against the mayor and expansion of the scheme. While many protesters hold legitimate concerns about the Ulez expansion, the Guardian’s Richard Sprenger discovers that conspiracy theories are never far from the surface.

London Ulez averts more air pollution than that caused by capital’s airports, report shows
The Guardian view on London’s low emission zone: doing the right thing.

Subscribe to The Guardian on YouTube ► bit.ly/subscribegdn

The Guardian publishes independent journalism, made possible by supporters. Contribute to The Guardian today ► bit.ly/3uhA7zg

Sign up to the Guardian's free new daily newsletter, First Edition ► theguardian.com/first-edition

Website ► www.theguardian.com/
Facebook ►www.facebook.com/theguardian
Twitter ► twitter.com/guardian
Instagram ► instagram.com/guardian

The Guardian on YouTube:
Guardian News ► bit.ly/guardiannewssubs
Guardian Australia ► bit.ly/guardianaussubs
Guardian Football ► bit.ly/gdnfootballsubs
Guardian Sport ► bit.ly/gdnsportsubs
Guardian Live ► bit.ly/guardianlivesubs

#Ulez #ulezexpansion #bladerunner #ulezdinosaurs #ulezprotest #London #UK #Pollution #Climate #News

All Comments (21)
  • @malc.s.5373
    Whatever people's views on pollution, the poor are being hit again, whilst "leaders" continue to travel the world in private jets. Would be nice to see them set an example.
  • @TheSpuggy1965
    They say we must reduce pollution but if you pay them £12.50 you can pollute as much as you like. It’s not about pollution is it?
  • @AJTrain
    ULEZ is bizarre. How my 1.2 fiesta can be charged for being too polluting but a 6.3 litre Mercedes with a modified exhaust removing all catalytic converters is fine and free to drive in London is ridiculous.
  • @khalidacosta7133
    Air pollution in London is not a conspiracy theory. It's a disagreement on WHO pays for the cost. The wealthy person who pollutes the most or the people close to poverty who pollutes the least. We live in a world where the wealthy can use a private jet to go right into the centre of London but a pensioner with an old, small vehicle is charged £40. See the problem now? Even at the Teddington Action Group, which Khan used the data from to oppose a third runway at Heathrow, the study showed 50% of NOx was caused by Heathrow.... 10 miles away!
  • @nosferatut9084
    People in the UK and Ireland need to stop voting for the Major Parties or this will never stop.
  • @tonyjennings8199
    If 95% of vehicles meet the ulez clean air standards - why have this massive expense of a camera network to monitor all the vehicles and to charge the 5% who are unable at this point in time of buying a new car? WHY???
  • @pauldurkee4764
    The Guardian really doesn't have the moral authority to comment on what ordinary people feel or do, they are not even what you would call journalists. My advice to the people of London, don't be pushed around by anyone.👍
  • @Beatlefan67
    If my car passed its MOT on emissions but still gets £12.50/day for this ULEZ nonsense, it makes no sense!
  • @ricardo1e93
    Uk almost feels like china in someway. The thirst of control via cameras in insane.
  • @joebloggs9719
    As always the ivory tower guardian journalists are totally out of touch with the normal working public
  • @weepz
    ULEZ does not stop old polluting cars driving through London, if this was really about air pollution they would be banned outright, no questions asked.
  • @richbrice3299
    You can tell this guy works for the Guardian. He is so patronising! Air quality has improved in London as vehicles have become cleaner. Scrapping a million MOtable cars is not environmentally sound. I'm guessing you're not affected by this. Wake up Mr Guardian.
  • @grifda
    While those that make the rules with the global 2030 cities fly in their private jets eating steak telling us we need to cut our CO2 emissions. Blade runners are the real heroes.
  • @rjprivate
    We need David Attenborough to narrate the dinosaur humping 😂
  • @rickdecko1096
    Why are the rich kids who run the guardian so hateful of the working class. The guardian is a example of every thing wrong today.
  • @johnshaw4140
    The ULEZ zone completely ignores the environmental impact of huge production of the number of new vehicles needed to replace those that already exist , completely insane
  • @sunraiii
    According to WTW, about 40% of all people in the UK already live paycheck to paycheck. It's safe to assume that many of these households own older, less environmentally friendly, but cheaper vehicles. So why tax the poor and risk higher rates of homelessness?
  • @k7y
    didn't knew Guardian was state controlled like the BBC