SC Judge Politically Biased?; Bhushan Tweet Sparks Debate #lawchakra #supremecourtofindia #analysis

88,846
0
Published 2024-04-29
SC Judge Politically Biased?; Bhushan Tweet Sparks Debate #lawchakra #supremecourtofindia #analysis

Follow us on Twitter:- twitter.com/LawChakra

Follow us on Whatsapp : whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaP5t4bEquiTbSG4LV0n

Visit Our Website:- lawchakra.in/

Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
#Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt

Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India

Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh

Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r

For business Enquiries:- [email protected]

#SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
#Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar


*This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.ЁЯУЪ

ЁЯЩП Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.

@Lawchakra
ЁЯСЙTwitter
twitter.com/LawChakra
ЁЯСЙ Instagram.
www.instagram.com/lawchakras/

ЁЯУС*Fair Use Policy -*
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair

All Comments (21)
  • People have lost faith in the Supreme Court. Where will the common man go to seek justice? These are clear signs of dictatorship creeping into our country. тЭдЁЯШвЁЯШв
  • Mahesh jethmalani never learn's , he is also a BJP bhakt he conveniently forget his father's observation regarding MODI
  • I applaud Prashant Bhushan! SC has let down Citizens on so many occasions. Lots of тАШgyaniтАЩ talk, but no actual action. Why shouldnтАЩt people express their opinions on тАШpolitically biasedтАЩ judgesтАжthere have been such, isnтАЩt it?
  • рдкреНрд░рд╢рд╛рдВрдд рднреВрд╖рдг рдиреЗ рдмрд┐рд▓реНрдХреБрд▓ рд╕рд╣реА рдмреЛрд▓рд╛ рд╣реИ......рдЬрдм рджреЗрд╢ рдХреА рдЬрдирддрд╛ рдЗрддрдиреА рддрд╛рджрд╛рдд рдореЗрдВ evm рдкрд░ рдЗрддрдирд╛ рд╕рдВрджреЗрд╣ рдЬрддрд╛ рд░рд╣реА рд╣реИ рддреЛ рднреА рдЬрдЬ рд╕рд╛рд╣реЗрдмрд╛рди рдиреЗ рд╕рд┐рд░реЗ рд╕реЗ рдореБрджреНрджреЗ рдХреЛ рдирдХрд╛рд░ рджрд┐рдпрд╛........
  • Will the supreme court explain to the people of this nation what problem it has on counting the Vvpat slips and match it with EVM?
  • @mpjakhmola4559
    рдЬрдм рд╡реАрдкреА рдкреИрдб рдХреА рдкрд░реНрдЪреА рдЧрд┐рдирдиреА рд╣реА рдирд╣реАрдВ рд╣реИ рддреЛ рдорд╕реАрди рд▓рдЧрд╛рдИ рдХреНрдпреЛрдВ рд╕рдордЭ рд╕реЗ рдкрд░реЗ рд╣реИ
  • @musicalrout2193
    рдорд╣реЗрд╢ рдЬреЗрдардорд▓рд╛рдиреА рдореЛрджреА рдкрд░рд┐рд╡рд╛рд░ рдХрд╛ рд╣реИ рд╡реЛ рдХреИрд╕реЗ рдирд┐рд╖реНрдкрдХреНрд╖ рдмреЛрд▓ рд╕рдХрддрд╛ рд╣реИред
  • @RamBansal
    Yes, doing justice is avoided to please those in power.
  • @kss7734
    Yes khanna most of decision are biased towards BJP
  • @harjvedios
    рдЬрдЬ рдмреАрдЬреЗрдкреА рдХреЗ рджрд▓рд╛рд▓ рд╣реИ рддреЛ рдЬрдЬрдореЗрдВрдЯ рдХрд╣рд╛рдВ рд╕реЗ рд╕рд╣реА рджреЗрдВрдЧреЗ
  • @rkvarma61
    рд▓реЛрдЧреЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдмрд╣реБрдд рд╡рд┐рд╢реНрд╡рд╛рд╕ рдерд╛ рд▓реЗрдХрд┐рди рдмрд╣реБрдд рд╡рд┐рд╢реНрд╡рд╛рд╕рдШрд╛рдд рд╣реБрдЖ рд╣реИред
  • @changed7652
    Everytime these two judges are targeting the opposition only.
  • @MIDRaju
    But why does such an important issue like EVM vs. ballot system which is the heart beat of adult franchise is allocated to a two judge bench only?
  • @raj_mepie
    рдПрдбрд╡реЛрдХреЗрдЯ рдмрд▓рд░рд╛рдЬ рдмрд┐рд▓реНрдХреБрд▓ рд╕рд╣реА рдХрд╣ рд░рд╣реЗ рд╣реИред
  • In a true democratic country, the voter should have the liberty/right to know and be satisfied that his or her vote has gone to the candidate to whom he or she voted. Any electoral mechanism should ensure this right of the voter. Why Supreme Court is not recognising this right of voter is both surprising and shocking.