Elon Musk files BOMBSHELL LAWSUIT against OpenAI (“They Achieved AGI”)
711,066
Published 2024-03-03
Join My Newsletter for Regular AI Updates 👇🏼
www.matthewberman.com/
Need AI Consulting? ✅
forwardfuture.ai/
My Links 🔗
👉🏻 Subscribe: youtube.com/@matthew_berman
👉🏻 Twitter: twitter.com/matthewberman
👉🏻 Discord: discord.gg/xxysSXBxFW
👉🏻 Patreon: patreon.com/MatthewBerman
Rent a GPU (MassedCompute) 🚀
bit.ly/matthew-berman-youtube
USE CODE "MatthewBerman" for 50% discount
Media/Sponsorship Inquiries 📈
bit.ly/44TC45V
All Comments (21)
-
Do you think Elon Musk is right?
-
Someone should start a company name ClosedAI but everything is open-source and it's actually Non-Profit.
-
Elon is 100% right to sue on this. Open AI isn't open. It was paid to stay open.
-
Grok is now open source btw. I believe Elon is doing good work. We should support him where is obvious that's the case
-
He is right on everything in the paper. For profit = end of humanity
-
I think Elon's analogy of the rainforest is spot on.
-
That was the best summary of this lawsuit I've seen yet. You knocked it out of the park!
-
The issue isn't about correctness; it's about determining who shapes the future, or perhaps who determines who gets to have a future, I think.
-
Yeah... If Elon wanted a for profit AI he would have started a company, not funded a non-profit
-
The gist of this lawsuit is OpenAI governance, that it cannot license anything it has to Microsoft or any licensees without retaining the rights to monitor and disclose future progress to the public, as the open source clause in the the founding certificate implies public disclosure by definition. Which means, if OpenAI did license anything to Microsoft without clauses to monitor and rights of public disclosure, it violates its own founding clauses, like US Constitution.
-
Referring to it as a “Manhattan Project” isn’t weird at all. The sole purpose of the Manhattan Project was to achieve the nuclear bomb before Germany or Russia. In this case the sole purpose of founding OpenAI was to achieve AGI before Google.
-
Microsoft's CEO said the quiet part out loud; even if this is successful, we already have all the tools we need to make the next big thing, and for profit! We win, you lose!
-
The difference is pocketing trillions as a for profit versus the billions they would have made as a not for profit.
-
The mistake was thinking a venture capitalist was capable of running a nonprofit. The only thing they know is profit.
-
Maybe the AGI wants the 7 Trillion Dollars.
-
I asked Copilot if it were an AGI. It said: "It might be time to move on to a new topic. Let's start over."
-
In python, when you want to import everything inside a module, you say “from [module name] import *”. In psychology, intelligence/IQ can be represented by the letter Q. So Qstar literally means intelligent on everything.
-
This lawsuit can expose illegal activity during the discovery process.
-
These companies are just TOO LARGE and need to be TRUST BUSTED they are out of control and too powerful to stop in their pursuit of ever greater profits and POWER.!
-
it doesn’t take artificial intelligence to predict that a group of humans committed to creating something together would infight to the point of deconstructing what they made
