The Satellite Orbit Tier List

356,653
0
Published 2023-03-06
Space is filled with satellites in interesting orbits, but which one is best? A crash course in astrodynamics in the format of "the BBC if they decided make a tier list video".

0:00 Introduction
1:05 Very Low Earth
1:55 International Space Station
2:36 Walker Constellation
3:12 Sun Synchronous
4:00 GPS
4:46 Flower
6:09 GEO
7:07 Graveyard
7:50 Molniya
8:22 Tundra
8:44 QZSS
9:11 Distant Retrograde
9:49 Lagrange
10:43 Outroduction

--------- II ---------

This video was brought to you by an unhealthy amount of coffee and our awesome Patrons at www.patreon.com/atomicfrontier.

--------- II ---------

Hi, I'm James. I explore the world looking for interesting engineering stories which explore complex issues in interesting ways. I hold a First-Class Honors in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Western Australia and am currently studying a Masters of Space Systems Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

My website is www.atomicfrontieronline.com/, I occasionally tweet from twitter.com/AtomicFrontiers, and you can join the Atomic Frontier Discord server to talk about cool engineering stuff at discord.gg/4QZc3jYdTR. You can help support my work and see some cool behind-the-scenes content at www.patreon.com/atomicfrontier.

All Comments (21)
  • I had no idea there were so many orbits! The Flower ones still freak me out a little
  • @nyuh
    if theres a meta-tierlist that ranks tierlists, this tierlist would be in the S tier.
  • I find it hard not to put geostationary in S-tier, it's just so damn useful for so many things.
  • @rileywilbur3938
    Great video but a slight correction/clarification. The US government doesn’t limit precision like they used to. That was called Selective Availability and was ended in 2000.
  • @axthelm
    I'm sad that you used the ISS for LEO orbits and ignored the rest. IceSat 2, Terra (any of the EOS satellites really), almost any spy satellite, or even Fermi and Hubble at the upper edge would have been a better option to talk about. None of them have the wonky inclination problems the ISS has. The biggest benefits of LEO are the variety of orbit types (look at the sun-synchronous LEO orbit of the A-Train) and ease of accessibly; it is the orbit of choice for most missions. Remember when Hubble had a lens problem? it wasn't too hard to get up there and fix it. It was the orbit height of choice for the space shuttles. Need a new earth observation? Throw it in LEO. You don't need a massive amount of fuel or complicated burns to get your satellite up there. The downside is that because of the convenience it is now cluttered with thousands of objects; include debris from nations shooting rockets at satellites to prove a point. I would give LEO a solid B-tier; not impressive but the work-horse of orbits.
  • Your tier list is S tier. 'Lagrange orbits, because you can't call everything Euler!'
  • I'm always a huge fan of any orbit where you get really complex and unintuitive interactions from mutliple bodies. Being used to KSP style single-body SoI mechanics it's always a trip to see how things actually works in an N-Body system.
  • I'm actually a bit surprised that you didn't straight up go to actual space and do a long one take coming back from a high orbit to a lower one. The quality of your channel kind of dictates that level of excellence. Next time, eh? I guess I'll just have to be happy with this perfectly explained, expertly animated gem of orbital mechanics. πŸ˜€
  • @FianFreigeist
    Beautiful video! I'm not sure what it is, but the video quality of you in front of the camera looks pretty good, together with this interesting and funny topic and clear animations you did an amazing video!
  • @_AvaGlass
    First of all, thank you for the subtitles. I know a lot of effort went into them and that effort is appreciated. Second, thank you for the 3D motion tracking. It has kind of become a hallmark of your channel and it adds a ton to the production value. Finally, how does this only have 11,530 views after 13 hours??
  • @jd7863
    Hitting it out of the park again! Your on-location filming skills are out of this world
  • @Nekzuris
    4:38 well not really, today GPS accuracy is not artificially limited, it's the ionosphere that cause signal distorsion and it's easy to correct it with RTK. Every modern farmer has RTK GPS to precisely guide the tractor on the fields with centimeter precision. For civilians, RTK corrections can be acquired via radio or internet, and the military can get them directly from the satellite.
  • @AthAthanasius
    04:15 - That's trilateration (using distances to known positions), not triangulation (using bearing angles to known positions). Also, GPS uses 4D space time calculations so that you don't actually need the receiver to also have a highly accurate atomic clock. Instead you just add a dimension, which means also needing an additional reference point, and learn not only where you are in 3D space, but also when you are in time.
  • @resurgam_b7
    I could listen to orbits and orbital mechanics being described for hours πŸ˜‚
  • @solidmagmr
    I would have never guessed that I would be able to watch a tier list of Satellite Orbits and enjoy it this much.
  • @Cinebon
    Bro casually walking around Acadia while explaining orbits, what a legend
  • Great video!! Some really amazing animations and shots in this one, was a ton of fun to watch!
  • Great video, and I especially liked the Lagrange/Euler commentary! πŸ˜„ Amazing work, as always, mate. πŸ‘
  • @LV-qr8fr
    Ummm I think this is my fav video of yours to date!!! You are awesome at making things I didn't ever think about really interesting and fun to watch and think about. And you are one of the channels whose videos I always want to look at vs just listen to. The visuals are so good πŸ‘ ty for sharing ☺️
  • 3:26 THANK YOU FOR EXPLAINING PURTUBATIONS Literally the hardest thing to get a straight answer from professors about when discussing orbits