IMF Slams Biden's Tariffs on Chinese Imports | Vantage with Palki Sharma

203,614
0
Published 2024-05-17
IMF Slams Biden's Tariffs on Chinese Imports | Vantage with Palki Sharma

A spokesperson for the International Monetary Fund criticised the tariffs announced by US president Joe Biden on imports from China. The IMF has said that trade restrictions will "fragment" the global economy, and that the US will be better served by maintaining open trade policies. The critical comments came days after Biden announced tariffs ranging from 100% for Chinese EVs to 50% for Chinese solar panels. In India, some exporters worry that cheap Chinese goods may flood the Indian market and affect the local industry. Even in January, Indian steel makers had lobbied the Indian government to hike tariffs on steel amid a rise in cheap Chinese imports. Palki Sharma tells you how Biden's tariffs will affect the global economy.

---

International Monetary Fund | Chinese Imports | Tariffs | US | Joe Biden | Firstpost | World News | News Live | Vantage | Palki Sharma | News

#internationalmonetaryfund #chineseimports #tariffs #us #joebiden #firstpost #vantageonfirstpost #palkisharma #worldnews

Vantage is a ground-breaking news, opinions, and current affairs show from Firstpost. Catering to a global audience, Vantage covers the biggest news stories from a 360-degree perspective, giving viewers a chance to assess the impact of world events through a uniquely Indian lens.

The show is anchored by Palki Sharma, Managing Editor, Firstpost.

By breaking stereotypes, Vantage aims to challenge conventional wisdom and present an alternative view on global affairs, defying the norm and opening the door to new perspectives. The show goes beyond the headlines to uncover the hidden stories – making Vantage a destination for thought-provoking ideas.

Vantage airs Monday to Friday at 9 PM IST on Firstpost across all leading platforms.

Subscribe to Firstpost channel and press the bell icon to get notified when we go live.
   / @firstpost  

Follow Firstpost on Instagram:
www.instagram.com/firstpost/

Follow Firstpost on Facebook:
www.facebook.com/firstpostin/

Follow Firstpost on Twitter:
twitter.com/firstpost

Follow Firstpost on WhatsApp:
www.whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va6zOIrEQIamseyg762V

All Comments (21)
  • @soyuz281
    Who knew that communists will be liberal on trade and capitalists will be resorting to protectionism.
  • @HewbhurtGabon
    Last year, I visited mainland China. Despite having magnificent infrastructure, affordable clean transportation, and safe, comfortable living, I found the Chinese people I met humble and not inclined to brag about their country. I keep saying that the cities in China are already first-world, but it seems that’s not what they think. They said they are happy with the government, and life is much better compared to the last three decades, but they still consider the country not rich.
  • @tengvang4927
    Here we go again!! Government billing out the auto industry. Or in this case stopping competition from entering the U.S market…
  • @daily_vibes77
    Somebody tell her that there are no illegal subsidy.. Every country provide subsidy only the scale are different
  • Does the 34 billion to bailout the automakers in 2008 count as a subsidies??!! The hypocrisy is crazy.
  • @RaviKiran-lx2kw
    This could one day happen to India too.. We should support China on this
  • @alfredhu7366
    Subsidies? Simple logic. Compare the cost of living in China and that of US is a world apart. Things are far more cheaper in China, so things produced will also be cheaper. The Chinese government need not subsidize it. It's the economy of scale. Automatically it's gonna be cheap.
  • @ALWH1314
    Not sure most American understand tariff is a tax on American, not Chinese.
  • @Andrian-ch3on
    Our economy struggling with uncertainties, housing issues, foreclosures, global fluctuations, and pandemic aftermath, causing instability. Rising inflation, sluggish growth, and trade disruptions need urgent attention from all sectors to restore stability and stimulate growth.
  • @joegoh1968
    This is called US' International Rules based order.
  • @johnconnors3962
    CHINA subsidies go to their industries. USA subsidies go to Israel and Ukraine.
  • @lukeecle117
    The United States imported approximately 70,000 made-in-China Ford, Volvo, GM new vehicles in 2023 (By the way, China exported a total of 4.91 million vehicles in 2023, the United States only accounts for 1.4% of China’s auto export market share in 2023 and almost no chinese brand ). No Chinese domestic car manufacturers have taken the initiative to officially sell their cars in the US. 102.5% tax on Chinese EVs, Go ahead. That must 'hurt 'China a lot, LOL. The US is not the center of the world. 30 094 767 new cars were sold in China in 2023 ( 8.1 million of them were electric vehicles ) , meanwhile only 15 604 278 new cars were sold in the usa (1.4 million were EVs). The US is expected to subsidize Tesla with $34B between 2023 and 2030. This isn’t even including the other subsidies that Tesla is going to receive from previous policies. Meanwhile, the Chinese government has subsidized BYD between 2018 and 2022 with the whopping massive amount of $ 3.7B. So the American company got subsidized 10 times more than the Chinese company, out of the $119B in battery subsidies GM got about $21 B, the truth is the US regime is subsidizing their electric vehicles way more than China is. On November 30, 2023 GM announced record $10 billion stock buyback, more than it’s spending on UAW raises- as its electrification push stalls (Source Bloomberg). That share buyback from General Motors was just q4 of 2023, $10 B, they get $20B in subsidies and they spend $10 B giving that money back to shareholders. The money isn’t going to innovation like it should, the money seems to go these bloated bureaucratic corporations where they take the money give it to shareholders or give it to executive bonuses or management teams that don’t know how to build a car, get so complicated convoluted they just can’t do business competitively anymore. They don’t need to, instead of being forced to be competitive, being forced to actually spend the money on R&D and producing a high-quality product, they just put a 102.5% tariff on anybody that they cannot compete.
  • @postman11
    Its not just about china ,it can happen to india too , international trade law must not be crushed for political reasons or per say dirty business tactics
  • @user-bt8cu2tu1q
    In 1980S they did the same thing to the Japanese car,and we are not surprise they are doing again to the Chinese car.In their mind if they have the advantage they want free market,if they are far behind, they will take every excuse to ban the competitors and protect their own industry.But the truth is even the tariff is 102.5%,the Chinese car is still cheaper and better than the American brand make in U.S and the U.S company still needs to import batteries from China.Only the America consumers hurt.
  • @user-wu3uu5sb3g
    Simple words: IMF don't want crazy thing happen again to world economy
  • @kevinl7173
    Exporters don't care as much as before because American people pay for the tariffs, the only problem is it will push up inflation
  • Oh i didnt know that IMF is Alive 😂 .. pwe! Dont believe chameleon .. IMF is US and West 😂😂😂