Which TINY WHOOP Batteries are BEST?: Testing NewBeeDrone, GNB, CNHL, Tattu and MORE!

10,410
0
Published 2023-10-08
If you value my work and want to support more battery testing: patreon.com/chris_rosser
To contact me about battery testing: aos-rc.com

Timestamps:

0:00 Intro
1:23 Test Equipment
2:42 Test Procedure
4:06 Data Analysis
4:36 Open door battery testing!
5:25 Test Results: Energy Delivered (Wh)
6:27 Energy Density (Wh/g)
7:23 Max Power (W)
8:54 Power density (W/g)
9:34 Voltage sag
11:35 Summary scores
12:42 Outro

All Comments (21)
  • @volkergoe
    Thanks again for putting the work in! ❤ I'd love to see a comparison of new packs vs. 50cycles vs. 100cycles vs. 150cycles. It would really help people who don't fly as much to get an idea how packs normally degrade. p.s.: could you add internal resistance?
  • @djs134
    Tattu by2.0 folded cell, webleedfpv by2.0 and tinywhoop bt2.0 lipos would be nice to see in the test.
  • @blastaa
    While this data is fantastic. The most popular batteries for top pilots are tinywhoop, webleed, nitronectar, and tattu bt2.0 and they are not even on the list. I really don't think there is a reason to test ph2.0 connectors when we know they're worse.
  • @manski209
    Thank you for taking the time to do the work and thank you for what you do for the fpv community, its very much appreciated.
  • @alainassaf
    yey it's live... been waiting for it :) and thanks JB for the equipment !
  • @skysailorfpv
    Thank you, Chris, for all you do some may not like the results, but I do appreciate the testing it really helps me get the most for my money, can't wait to get your motors
  • @fokusfpv
    Thanks for doing all the science on batteries and in general, Chris! we are making the move over to the a30 plug which seems like a good idea. Surprised by the Newbeedrone. It would be great to see the next tier up on capacities moving into the 450, etc for the next size up whoops. Patreon for FPV ever! Thanks again, Chris 🫡
  • @TheDjFac
    Impressive! I think we would love to have look in the intro of each tested cell (a picture of each) to really know which is which at the end. Another thing, 300mah folded cells with plastic head and bt2.0 like tattu’s / webleedfpv are missing from those tests unless we assume they are exactly the same as the nitro nectar ones… who knows?… you may enlighten us in the future
  • @Ozzy3333333
    Thanks for sharing. I would have expected to see ESR numbers with a top notch meter like Wayne Gills meter (consistent down to 0.1mOhm). For my los flying it is the major truth detector instead of the sales C ratings. Of course these need to be tested at the same temp and voltage levels (I suggest storage 3.85v). Also pack temperature rise after your tests. And on another topic: battery break in, some say it's snake oil, but in rc car racing, it's a performance advantage if done right, maybe you can validate and bust some myths.
  • @exp3rt468
    Yes Chris! Finaly someone who wants to test all kinds of batteries. I always feelt like there are difrences but now we are going to getthe facts to prove it!
  • @starlino
    I would like to see how they perform after 10-20 discharge cycles. Also how they perform if accidenrally overdischarged or stored at non-storage voltage.
  • @MCsCreations
    Fantastic testing and comparison, Chris! Thanks a bunch! 😃 Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
  • @turionb1408
    awesome thanks for all the work you do formthe community
  • @BoilerFPV
    It would be helpful to do a comparison by connector type. The popular claims are that the newer designs (e.g., BT2.0, GNB 27, and A30) are much better than PH2.0. But, the data seems to suggest this may not always be the case.
  • @eedok
    Weird to see a comparison like this where the top batteries used by whoop racers are omitted (the bt2.0 tattus/webleed/tinywhoop at both 300mah and 270mah)