Part 2: Mathematician's Commentary on Terrence Howard's Rogan Appearance
1,340
Published 2024-06-07
Link to Part 1: • Mathematician's Commentary on Terrenc...
This is part of a video series deep-diving into Terrence Howard's adventures in pseudoscience, as well as providing peer review for his more outrageous mathematical claims. His book has actually been available to download for free for some time now, and I have read the entire godawful thing. It was one of the worst experiences of my life. But it was also hilarious in many ways, and I hope that my "peer review" project for this summer brings my audience some joy, and makes people laugh: so that Terrence Howard may have at least a small chance to be a net positive in the world, as opposed to just pure scum. Terrence Howard spews nonsense and calls it Science. He is a fraud, and a liar, and a manipulative narcissist of the highest order. His book is trash. I want to waste printer ink to print it all out on paper so I can burn it. My goal is to deep-dive into EVERY MATHEMATICAL component of his manuscript Magnum Opus, "One Times One Equals Two", in a very professional style, such as this,. It will be quite the feat!! Terrence Howard sent an early copy of his book to Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson, and Dr. Tyson has since responded with some of his peer review.
I have issued a challenge to Mr. Howard, to debate like gentlemen. In a scholarly manner, at a scholarly location, in a scholarly way. For no cash prize. However, if the rumors are true that he has a public humiliation f*tish, and is using the debate as a means of getting off, I would NOT be down! Or are ya bawk bawk chicken, #TerrenceCoward ???
Disclaimer: Videos featured for commentary are used in alignment with legal Fair Use of Copyrighted Materials. Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1986 (17 U.S. Code § 107) states that fair use of copyrighted material "for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." #terrencehoward , #neildegrassetyson , #mathematics , #math , #debunk, #terrencecoward, #science , #pseudoscience , #debunking , #debunked, #joerogan , #joeroganexperience , #roganexperience , #mathematics , #mathematician , #book , #books , #absurd , #critique , #review , #peerreview , #comedy , #satire , #SchoolingTerrenceHoward , #SchoolinTerry
All Comments (20)
-
-
Here's what Einstein said on his deathbed according to the American Museum of Natural History: "I want to go when I want to go. It is tasteless to prolong life artificially. I have done my share; it is time to go"
-
it’s just genius math mayne
-
I always thought Einstein had SOME last words heard about death, but his actual, proper last words are unknown as he said them in German and the nurse with him didn't understand it.
-
Would Terence Howard be considered a crackpot by definition.
-
all of his research stems from the idea that there are "no straight lines in nature " so I would love to see someone debate him directly on that
-
Just stay focused on having fun. This is for no one. You just being honest.
-
I was hoping you would do a review of this jre episode
-
The first thing you mention here is that what he means by to magnify is actually magnetise. He literally said the word magnify and then proceeds to say to make something larger. Not for one second did he say to magnetise. So yes, his use of MAGNIFY is correct.
-
Is not ok to make fun of a mentally ill person.
-
He was actually kind of good in Crash as well.
-
The angle of the dangle = the heat of the Meat
-
everybody saying he crazy but everybody wanna talk about him 😁
-
okay what about the lynchpin project , who have several protype on video on youtube
-
Rogan used to be a skeptic. now he's one of the biggest simps on youtube.
-
Why don't you challenge him publicly face to face
-
you're just rambling. the guy is challenging science in real time.
-
Your insulting his acting was just laughable , jealous lol B it ch
-
Your personal attacks make me believe him more. You only providers one real argument against his after your onslaught of personal attacks. You claim the Platonic solids are 3d, which is true, However Terrence claim was that they have straight lines which he claims is false. Reflect on your character and what you bring to this world
